1. IQ — Intelligence Quotient
Designer: Alfred Binet & Théodore Simon (France, 1905)
Calculation (4 lines):
• Early version: Mental Age ÷ Chronological Age × 100.
• Modern versions compare your raw test score to a large population.
• Scores are normalized so average = 100 (SD = 15).
• Measures reasoning, memory, logic, pattern recognition.
⸻
2. EQ — Emotional Quotient
Designer: Reuven Bar-On (EQ-i, 1990); concept by Salovey & Mayer (1990).
Calculation:
• Self-report questionnaire across 5 domains (self-awareness, empathy, stress control, etc.).
• Each question scored 1–5 or 1–7 and summed.
• Converted into sub-scale scores → combined into Global EQ.
• Compared to age-norm groups for percentile ranking.
⸻
3. AQ — Adversity Quotient
Designer: Dr. Paul G. Stoltz (ARP Test, 1997).
Calculation:
• Measures 4 C.O.R.E. areas: Control, Ownership, Reach, Endurance.
• Questions rated 1–5 or 1–7 evaluating reaction to adversity.
• Sub-scores summed to make Total AQ Score.
• Interpreted as: low resilience, moderate, or high.
⸻
4. SQ — Spiritual Quotient
Designers: Cindy Wigglesworth (SQ21); David King (SISRI-24).
Calculation:
• Questionnaire with 21 or 24 items.
• Assesses meaning, compassion, higher-self awareness.
• Scores summed into sub-dimensions → composite SQ.
• Compared to general population norms.
⸻
5. CQ — Cultural Quotient
Designers: Soon Ang & Linn Van Dyne (1990s).
Calculation:
• Measures 4 areas: Motivation, Cognition, Strategy, Behavior.
• Respondents rate statements 1–7 based on cross-cultural comfort.
• Sub-scores averaged → total CQ score.
• Used in global leadership & HR assessments.
⸻
6. Cq — Creativity Quotient
Designer: E. Paul Torrance (“Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking”, 1966).
Calculation:
• Measures Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration.
• Creativity tasks (drawings, stories) scored using rubrics.
• Raw creativity points converted to age norms.
• Outputs a standardized Creativity Quotient.
⸻
7. FQ — Financial Quotient
Designers: Various; most commonly OECD Financial Literacy Framework.
Calculation:
• Tests basic money skills (saving, borrowing, risk, interest).
• Answers scored right/wrong and converted to percentages.
• Sub-scores: knowledge, behavior, attitudes.
• Used by banks & governments for financial education.
⸻
8. BQ — Business Quotient
Designers: Derived from Harvard, McKinsey, Drucker models (no single creator).
Calculation:
• Case questions rated for strategic thinking, decision-making, risk logic.
• Scores from structured rubrics (0–5 per competency).
• Combined into Strategy, Operations, Finance sub-scores.
• Total BQ is an average of all competencies.
⸻
9. LQ — Leadership Quotient
Designer: Dr. John Maxwell’s framework is most referenced.
Calculation:
• 360-degree surveys: peers, bosses, self rate leadership behaviors.
• Feedback converted into competency scores (communication, influence).
• Weighted average produces LQ.
• Higher LQ = stronger influence + emotional mastery.
⸻
10. WQ — Willpower Quotient
Designer: Based on research by Kelly McGonigal + Baumeister’s self-control model.
Calculation:
• Self-control tasks: delay of gratification, impulse inhibition, persistence.
• Scored through scenario-based questions (1–5).
• Sub-scores: Discipline, Impulse Control, Focus.
• Combined to form WQ.
⸻
11. NQ — Networking Quotient
Designer: Developed in business schools (Wharton, HBR) — not one inventor.
Calculation:
• Measures size, quality, and diversity of personal network.
• Scores include reciprocity, influence reach, relationship depth.
• Weighted into a Networking Index.
• Higher NQ = stronger social capital.
⸻
12. RQ — Relationship Quotient
Designer: Dr. John Gottman (Gottman Relationship Assessment).
Calculation:
• 100–300 questions about conflict, empathy, communication.
• Algorithms predict stability, satisfaction, and communication quality.
• Sub-domains scored → combined to RQ.
• Used in marriage counseling + couples therapy.
⸻
13. PQ — Physical Quotient
Designer: Based on ACSM physical fitness standards.
Calculation:
• Tests strength, stamina, flexibility, endurance.
• Raw performance (push-ups, VO2 max) → converted to fitness norms.
• Sub-scores averaged: cardio, strength, mobility.
• Output = Physical Fitness Index.
⸻
14. DQ — Digital Quotient
Designers: McKinsey Digital (2014).
Calculation:
• Survey measuring digital literacy, adoption, and innovation.
• Individual or company scored across 18 competencies.
• Weighted index creates DQ score.
• Used widely in digital transformation projects.
⸻
15. HQ — Happiness Quotient
Designer: Derived from Martin Seligman’s PERMA Model.
Calculation:
• Measures Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, Achievement.
• Responses scored on 1–7 scale.
• Total PERMA score → Happiness Index.
• Higher = greater subjective well-being.
⸻
16. KQ — Knowledge Quotient
Designer: Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy + academic knowledge frameworks.
Calculation:
• Tests general knowledge across multiple domains.
• Answers scored right/wrong.
• Converted to percentile norms.
• Higher KQ = broader and deeper knowledge.
⸻
17. OQ — Organization Quotient
Designers: Time-management schools (Covey, Drucker).
Calculation:
• Measures planning skills, habit systems, clarity, structure.
• Self-assessment questions scored 1–5.
• Sub-scores: Time, Space, Tasks, Systems.
• Average = OQ.
⸻
18. XQ — Experience Quotient
Designer: Used by UX researchers (Forrester, Nielsen Norman Group).
Calculation:
• Measures how well a person learns from experiences.
• Behavioral scenarios scored by accuracy + insight.
• Sub-dimensions: Reflection, Adaptation, Pattern Recognition.
• Combined to create XQ.
⸻
19. GQ — Gratitude Quotient
Designer: Robert Emmons (UC Davis; leading gratitude researcher).
Calculation:
• 6–10 items on gratitude habits + emotional frequency.
• Scored 1–7 and summed.
• Compared to norms for interpretation.
• Higher GQ = more happiness + emotional health.
⸻
20. MQ — Moral Quotient
Designer: Based on Lawrence Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory.
Calculation:
• Scenario-based moral dilemmas.
• Scored on reasoning level (pre-conventional, conventional, post-conventional).
• Converted into stage score.
• Higher MQ = more advanced ethical reasoning.
⸻
21. EgoQ — Ego Quotient (Your Invention)
Designer: Rehan Allahwala
Calculation (proposed):
• Detects defensiveness, blame, pride, insecurity, tone aggression.
• Uses AI tone/emotion analysis + question responses.
• Weighted sub-scores: Humility, Openness, Empathy, Reaction Control.
• Overall EgoQ = 0–100 (100 = high ego, 0 = ego-free).
Designer: Alfred Binet & Théodore Simon (France, 1905)
Calculation (4 lines):
• Early version: Mental Age ÷ Chronological Age × 100.
• Modern versions compare your raw test score to a large population.
• Scores are normalized so average = 100 (SD = 15).
• Measures reasoning, memory, logic, pattern recognition.
⸻
2. EQ — Emotional Quotient
Designer: Reuven Bar-On (EQ-i, 1990); concept by Salovey & Mayer (1990).
Calculation:
• Self-report questionnaire across 5 domains (self-awareness, empathy, stress control, etc.).
• Each question scored 1–5 or 1–7 and summed.
• Converted into sub-scale scores → combined into Global EQ.
• Compared to age-norm groups for percentile ranking.
⸻
3. AQ — Adversity Quotient
Designer: Dr. Paul G. Stoltz (ARP Test, 1997).
Calculation:
• Measures 4 C.O.R.E. areas: Control, Ownership, Reach, Endurance.
• Questions rated 1–5 or 1–7 evaluating reaction to adversity.
• Sub-scores summed to make Total AQ Score.
• Interpreted as: low resilience, moderate, or high.
⸻
4. SQ — Spiritual Quotient
Designers: Cindy Wigglesworth (SQ21); David King (SISRI-24).
Calculation:
• Questionnaire with 21 or 24 items.
• Assesses meaning, compassion, higher-self awareness.
• Scores summed into sub-dimensions → composite SQ.
• Compared to general population norms.
⸻
5. CQ — Cultural Quotient
Designers: Soon Ang & Linn Van Dyne (1990s).
Calculation:
• Measures 4 areas: Motivation, Cognition, Strategy, Behavior.
• Respondents rate statements 1–7 based on cross-cultural comfort.
• Sub-scores averaged → total CQ score.
• Used in global leadership & HR assessments.
⸻
6. Cq — Creativity Quotient
Designer: E. Paul Torrance (“Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking”, 1966).
Calculation:
• Measures Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration.
• Creativity tasks (drawings, stories) scored using rubrics.
• Raw creativity points converted to age norms.
• Outputs a standardized Creativity Quotient.
⸻
7. FQ — Financial Quotient
Designers: Various; most commonly OECD Financial Literacy Framework.
Calculation:
• Tests basic money skills (saving, borrowing, risk, interest).
• Answers scored right/wrong and converted to percentages.
• Sub-scores: knowledge, behavior, attitudes.
• Used by banks & governments for financial education.
⸻
8. BQ — Business Quotient
Designers: Derived from Harvard, McKinsey, Drucker models (no single creator).
Calculation:
• Case questions rated for strategic thinking, decision-making, risk logic.
• Scores from structured rubrics (0–5 per competency).
• Combined into Strategy, Operations, Finance sub-scores.
• Total BQ is an average of all competencies.
⸻
9. LQ — Leadership Quotient
Designer: Dr. John Maxwell’s framework is most referenced.
Calculation:
• 360-degree surveys: peers, bosses, self rate leadership behaviors.
• Feedback converted into competency scores (communication, influence).
• Weighted average produces LQ.
• Higher LQ = stronger influence + emotional mastery.
⸻
10. WQ — Willpower Quotient
Designer: Based on research by Kelly McGonigal + Baumeister’s self-control model.
Calculation:
• Self-control tasks: delay of gratification, impulse inhibition, persistence.
• Scored through scenario-based questions (1–5).
• Sub-scores: Discipline, Impulse Control, Focus.
• Combined to form WQ.
⸻
11. NQ — Networking Quotient
Designer: Developed in business schools (Wharton, HBR) — not one inventor.
Calculation:
• Measures size, quality, and diversity of personal network.
• Scores include reciprocity, influence reach, relationship depth.
• Weighted into a Networking Index.
• Higher NQ = stronger social capital.
⸻
12. RQ — Relationship Quotient
Designer: Dr. John Gottman (Gottman Relationship Assessment).
Calculation:
• 100–300 questions about conflict, empathy, communication.
• Algorithms predict stability, satisfaction, and communication quality.
• Sub-domains scored → combined to RQ.
• Used in marriage counseling + couples therapy.
⸻
13. PQ — Physical Quotient
Designer: Based on ACSM physical fitness standards.
Calculation:
• Tests strength, stamina, flexibility, endurance.
• Raw performance (push-ups, VO2 max) → converted to fitness norms.
• Sub-scores averaged: cardio, strength, mobility.
• Output = Physical Fitness Index.
⸻
14. DQ — Digital Quotient
Designers: McKinsey Digital (2014).
Calculation:
• Survey measuring digital literacy, adoption, and innovation.
• Individual or company scored across 18 competencies.
• Weighted index creates DQ score.
• Used widely in digital transformation projects.
⸻
15. HQ — Happiness Quotient
Designer: Derived from Martin Seligman’s PERMA Model.
Calculation:
• Measures Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, Achievement.
• Responses scored on 1–7 scale.
• Total PERMA score → Happiness Index.
• Higher = greater subjective well-being.
⸻
16. KQ — Knowledge Quotient
Designer: Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy + academic knowledge frameworks.
Calculation:
• Tests general knowledge across multiple domains.
• Answers scored right/wrong.
• Converted to percentile norms.
• Higher KQ = broader and deeper knowledge.
⸻
17. OQ — Organization Quotient
Designers: Time-management schools (Covey, Drucker).
Calculation:
• Measures planning skills, habit systems, clarity, structure.
• Self-assessment questions scored 1–5.
• Sub-scores: Time, Space, Tasks, Systems.
• Average = OQ.
⸻
18. XQ — Experience Quotient
Designer: Used by UX researchers (Forrester, Nielsen Norman Group).
Calculation:
• Measures how well a person learns from experiences.
• Behavioral scenarios scored by accuracy + insight.
• Sub-dimensions: Reflection, Adaptation, Pattern Recognition.
• Combined to create XQ.
⸻
19. GQ — Gratitude Quotient
Designer: Robert Emmons (UC Davis; leading gratitude researcher).
Calculation:
• 6–10 items on gratitude habits + emotional frequency.
• Scored 1–7 and summed.
• Compared to norms for interpretation.
• Higher GQ = more happiness + emotional health.
⸻
20. MQ — Moral Quotient
Designer: Based on Lawrence Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory.
Calculation:
• Scenario-based moral dilemmas.
• Scored on reasoning level (pre-conventional, conventional, post-conventional).
• Converted into stage score.
• Higher MQ = more advanced ethical reasoning.
⸻
21. EgoQ — Ego Quotient (Your Invention)
Designer: Rehan Allahwala
Calculation (proposed):
• Detects defensiveness, blame, pride, insecurity, tone aggression.
• Uses AI tone/emotion analysis + question responses.
• Weighted sub-scores: Humility, Openness, Empathy, Reaction Control.
• Overall EgoQ = 0–100 (100 = high ego, 0 = ego-free).
⭐ 1. IQ — Intelligence Quotient
Designer: Alfred Binet & Théodore Simon (France, 1905)
Calculation (4 lines):
• Early version: Mental Age ÷ Chronological Age × 100.
• Modern versions compare your raw test score to a large population.
• Scores are normalized so average = 100 (SD = 15).
• Measures reasoning, memory, logic, pattern recognition.
⸻
⭐ 2. EQ — Emotional Quotient
Designer: Reuven Bar-On (EQ-i, 1990); concept by Salovey & Mayer (1990).
Calculation:
• Self-report questionnaire across 5 domains (self-awareness, empathy, stress control, etc.).
• Each question scored 1–5 or 1–7 and summed.
• Converted into sub-scale scores → combined into Global EQ.
• Compared to age-norm groups for percentile ranking.
⸻
⭐ 3. AQ — Adversity Quotient
Designer: Dr. Paul G. Stoltz (ARP Test, 1997).
Calculation:
• Measures 4 C.O.R.E. areas: Control, Ownership, Reach, Endurance.
• Questions rated 1–5 or 1–7 evaluating reaction to adversity.
• Sub-scores summed to make Total AQ Score.
• Interpreted as: low resilience, moderate, or high.
⸻
⭐ 4. SQ — Spiritual Quotient
Designers: Cindy Wigglesworth (SQ21); David King (SISRI-24).
Calculation:
• Questionnaire with 21 or 24 items.
• Assesses meaning, compassion, higher-self awareness.
• Scores summed into sub-dimensions → composite SQ.
• Compared to general population norms.
⸻
⭐ 5. CQ — Cultural Quotient
Designers: Soon Ang & Linn Van Dyne (1990s).
Calculation:
• Measures 4 areas: Motivation, Cognition, Strategy, Behavior.
• Respondents rate statements 1–7 based on cross-cultural comfort.
• Sub-scores averaged → total CQ score.
• Used in global leadership & HR assessments.
⸻
⭐ 6. Cq — Creativity Quotient
Designer: E. Paul Torrance (“Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking”, 1966).
Calculation:
• Measures Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration.
• Creativity tasks (drawings, stories) scored using rubrics.
• Raw creativity points converted to age norms.
• Outputs a standardized Creativity Quotient.
⸻
⭐ 7. FQ — Financial Quotient
Designers: Various; most commonly OECD Financial Literacy Framework.
Calculation:
• Tests basic money skills (saving, borrowing, risk, interest).
• Answers scored right/wrong and converted to percentages.
• Sub-scores: knowledge, behavior, attitudes.
• Used by banks & governments for financial education.
⸻
⭐ 8. BQ — Business Quotient
Designers: Derived from Harvard, McKinsey, Drucker models (no single creator).
Calculation:
• Case questions rated for strategic thinking, decision-making, risk logic.
• Scores from structured rubrics (0–5 per competency).
• Combined into Strategy, Operations, Finance sub-scores.
• Total BQ is an average of all competencies.
⸻
⭐ 9. LQ — Leadership Quotient
Designer: Dr. John Maxwell’s framework is most referenced.
Calculation:
• 360-degree surveys: peers, bosses, self rate leadership behaviors.
• Feedback converted into competency scores (communication, influence).
• Weighted average produces LQ.
• Higher LQ = stronger influence + emotional mastery.
⸻
⭐ 10. WQ — Willpower Quotient
Designer: Based on research by Kelly McGonigal + Baumeister’s self-control model.
Calculation:
• Self-control tasks: delay of gratification, impulse inhibition, persistence.
• Scored through scenario-based questions (1–5).
• Sub-scores: Discipline, Impulse Control, Focus.
• Combined to form WQ.
⸻
⭐ 11. NQ — Networking Quotient
Designer: Developed in business schools (Wharton, HBR) — not one inventor.
Calculation:
• Measures size, quality, and diversity of personal network.
• Scores include reciprocity, influence reach, relationship depth.
• Weighted into a Networking Index.
• Higher NQ = stronger social capital.
⸻
⭐ 12. RQ — Relationship Quotient
Designer: Dr. John Gottman (Gottman Relationship Assessment).
Calculation:
• 100–300 questions about conflict, empathy, communication.
• Algorithms predict stability, satisfaction, and communication quality.
• Sub-domains scored → combined to RQ.
• Used in marriage counseling + couples therapy.
⸻
⭐ 13. PQ — Physical Quotient
Designer: Based on ACSM physical fitness standards.
Calculation:
• Tests strength, stamina, flexibility, endurance.
• Raw performance (push-ups, VO2 max) → converted to fitness norms.
• Sub-scores averaged: cardio, strength, mobility.
• Output = Physical Fitness Index.
⸻
⭐ 14. DQ — Digital Quotient
Designers: McKinsey Digital (2014).
Calculation:
• Survey measuring digital literacy, adoption, and innovation.
• Individual or company scored across 18 competencies.
• Weighted index creates DQ score.
• Used widely in digital transformation projects.
⸻
⭐ 15. HQ — Happiness Quotient
Designer: Derived from Martin Seligman’s PERMA Model.
Calculation:
• Measures Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, Achievement.
• Responses scored on 1–7 scale.
• Total PERMA score → Happiness Index.
• Higher = greater subjective well-being.
⸻
⭐ 16. KQ — Knowledge Quotient
Designer: Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy + academic knowledge frameworks.
Calculation:
• Tests general knowledge across multiple domains.
• Answers scored right/wrong.
• Converted to percentile norms.
• Higher KQ = broader and deeper knowledge.
⸻
⭐ 17. OQ — Organization Quotient
Designers: Time-management schools (Covey, Drucker).
Calculation:
• Measures planning skills, habit systems, clarity, structure.
• Self-assessment questions scored 1–5.
• Sub-scores: Time, Space, Tasks, Systems.
• Average = OQ.
⸻
⭐ 18. XQ — Experience Quotient
Designer: Used by UX researchers (Forrester, Nielsen Norman Group).
Calculation:
• Measures how well a person learns from experiences.
• Behavioral scenarios scored by accuracy + insight.
• Sub-dimensions: Reflection, Adaptation, Pattern Recognition.
• Combined to create XQ.
⸻
⭐ 19. GQ — Gratitude Quotient
Designer: Robert Emmons (UC Davis; leading gratitude researcher).
Calculation:
• 6–10 items on gratitude habits + emotional frequency.
• Scored 1–7 and summed.
• Compared to norms for interpretation.
• Higher GQ = more happiness + emotional health.
⸻
⭐ 20. MQ — Moral Quotient
Designer: Based on Lawrence Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory.
Calculation:
• Scenario-based moral dilemmas.
• Scored on reasoning level (pre-conventional, conventional, post-conventional).
• Converted into stage score.
• Higher MQ = more advanced ethical reasoning.
⸻
⭐ 21. EgoQ — Ego Quotient (Your Invention)
Designer: Rehan Allahwala
Calculation (proposed):
• Detects defensiveness, blame, pride, insecurity, tone aggression.
• Uses AI tone/emotion analysis + question responses.
• Weighted sub-scores: Humility, Openness, Empathy, Reaction Control.
• Overall EgoQ = 0–100 (100 = high ego, 0 = ego-free).
0 Yorumlar
0 hisse senetleri
325 Views