• Shadi Ka Shauq ka Shock !! :) - Happy Wedding Raza Mumtaz Rao
    Shadi Ka Shauq ka Shock !! :) - Happy Wedding Raza Mumtaz Rao
    0 Comments 0 Shares 351 Views
  • Meet Sami Khaleeq from Houston, A great video of the studios of HumTumRadio !!!

    He does social media, make sure you connect to him and follow his post to learn from him :)
    Meet Sami Khaleeq from Houston, A great video of the studios of HumTumRadio !!! He does social media, make sure you connect to him and follow his post to learn from him :)
    0 Comments 0 Shares 321 Views
  • The Amazing Hasan Sohaib Murad

    Rector of UMT Lahore
    The Amazing Hasan Sohaib Murad Rector of UMT Lahore
    0 Comments 0 Shares 277 Views
  • What are your feelings about the Mumtaz Qadri Case ?
    What are your feelings about the Mumtaz Qadri Case ?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 347 Views
  • Inbox received :

    Rehan Bhai Allah pak ka Ap pe khas karam hy Ap puri dunya ghumte hn logo ko jortay hn or logo ki behtary k lye kam krte hn...
    Mera Ap se swal hy 1 me lower middle class se talluk rakhta hu meri salry 14 thousnd hy me rent k makan me rehta hu mujh pe 1 maa or 1 Bemar Bhai ki zimedari hy me in peso me kese Ghar chalau? Mere pas to koi saving B nai hy na Boht zada Aala taleem hy.....me mehroom or Be kasi wali zindagi nai guzarna chahta sir...please muje guide krn Sir me Apni or Apne Ghar walo ki zindagi kese behtar kru?

    Answer: please make 1200 mutual friends, and once you are done, I will be able to guide you what to do as by then you will have a huge vision, and your mind will open up to what I will tell you, be blessed !
    Inbox received : Rehan Bhai Allah pak ka Ap pe khas karam hy Ap puri dunya ghumte hn logo ko jortay hn or logo ki behtary k lye kam krte hn... Mera Ap se swal hy 1 me lower middle class se talluk rakhta hu meri salry 14 thousnd hy me rent k makan me rehta hu mujh pe 1 maa or 1 Bemar Bhai ki zimedari hy me in peso me kese Ghar chalau? Mere pas to koi saving B nai hy na Boht zada Aala taleem hy.....me mehroom or Be kasi wali zindagi nai guzarna chahta sir...please muje guide krn Sir me Apni or Apne Ghar walo ki zindagi kese behtar kru? Answer: please make 1200 mutual friends, and once you are done, I will be able to guide you what to do as by then you will have a huge vision, and your mind will open up to what I will tell you, be blessed !
    0 Comments 0 Shares 946 Views
  • we want your help sir regarding this startup event

    For registering yourself online and more details click on the link:
    https://goo.gl/forms/mQqSsNpZdNt2UUju1

    I look forward to your quality participation. Please write to us for any query at
    bizplanchallenge@skt.umt.edu.pk

    #BPC2017 #180KPRIZES #WORKSHOPS #ENTREPRENEURSHIP #startupcompetition
    we want your help sir regarding this startup event For registering yourself online and more details click on the link: https://goo.gl/forms/mQqSsNpZdNt2UUju1 I look forward to your quality participation. Please write to us for any query at bizplanchallenge@skt.umt.edu.pk #BPC2017 #180KPRIZES #WORKSHOPS #ENTREPRENEURSHIP #startupcompetition
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1319 Views
  • How many of them are on facebook ? Can you tag them

    PTI Parliamentary board Announced Tickets for National Assembly of Pakistan.#PTI
    NA 1: Imran Khan
    NA 3 : Noor Aalam Khan
    NA 5 : Perwaiz Khattak
    NA 29 : Murad Saeed
    NA 50 :Ghulam Murtaza Satti
    NA 51 : Raja Farhat Faheem
    NA 52 : Lt ,Col Ajmal Sabir
    NA 53 : Ghulam Sarwar Khan
    NA 57 : Malik Ameen Aslam Khan
    NA 58 : Malik Sohail Khan
    NA 59 : Muhammad Zain Elahi (Current MNA Independent ,real nephew of Ch perwaiz Elahi
    NA 60 : Ayaz Ameer
    NA 61 : Maj Tahir Sadiq
    NA 61 : Ch Saqlain
    NA 63 : Fawad hussain Ch
    NA 66 : Barrister Abdullah Mumtaz Kahloon
    NA 69 : Umar Aslam Khan
    NA 70 : Sardar Shujja Muhammad Khan
    NA 71 : Atta Ullah Essa khelvi
    NA 72 : Amjad Ali Khan Niazi
    NA 73 : Muhammad Sanaullah Khan Masti Khel
    NA 74 : Rasheed Akbar Khan nuwani
    NA 75 : Fawad Ahmed Cheema
    NA 78 : Muhammad Safdar Shakir
    NA 80 : Rana Zahid Touseef
    NA 91 : Sahibzada Muhammad Mehboob Sultan
    NA101: Muhammad Ahmed Chatta
    NA 102: Chaudhary Shaukat Ali Bhatti
    NA 108: Haji Mumtaz Ahmed Gujjar
    NA 109: Nazar Muhammad Gondal
    NA 110: Usman Dar
    NA 111: Dr firdos Ashiq Awan
    NA 125: IMRAN KHAN
    NA 128: Malik Karamat Khokar
    NA 131 : Umar Aftab Dhillon
    NA 140: Khursheed Qasoori
    NA 141: Sardar Muhammad Asif Nakai
    NA 142:Sardar Talib Nakai
    NA 150: Shah Mehmood Qureshi
    NA 152 : Ibraheem Khan
    NA 158 : Pir Zahoor Hussain Qureshi
    NA 159 : Malik Ghulam Murtaza Metla
    NA 160 : Ch Nauraiz Shakoor Khan
    NA 161 : Malik Muhammad Yar Dhakoo
    NA 163 : Malik Nauman Langriyal
    NA 165 : Mian Ahmed Raza Manika
    NA 168 :Ishaq Khakwani
    NA 169 : Aftab Ahmed Khan KIchi
    NA 170 : Muhammad Aurangzaib Khan Khichi
    NA 171: Khawja Sheeraz Mehmood
    NA 171 : Zartaj Gul Akhwand
    NA 173: Sardar Muhammad Saifuddin Khosa
    NA 174: Sardar Nasrullah Khan Dreshak
    NA 175:Mir Dost Muhammad Mazari
    NA 230 : Shah Mehmood Qureshi
    NA 256: Sardar Yar Mohammed Rind
    NA 259: Dawood Khan Kakar
    NA 260: Qasim Khan Suri
    NA 261: Nawab Khan Dumarr
    NA 262: Nazeer Khan Achakzai
    انفارمیشن سیکرٹری ریجن لاہور ۔
    How many of them are on facebook ? Can you tag them PTI Parliamentary board Announced Tickets for National Assembly of Pakistan.#PTI NA 1: Imran Khan NA 3 : Noor Aalam Khan NA 5 : Perwaiz Khattak NA 29 : Murad Saeed NA 50 :Ghulam Murtaza Satti NA 51 : Raja Farhat Faheem NA 52 : Lt ,Col Ajmal Sabir NA 53 : Ghulam Sarwar Khan NA 57 : Malik Ameen Aslam Khan NA 58 : Malik Sohail Khan NA 59 : Muhammad Zain Elahi (Current MNA Independent ,real nephew of Ch perwaiz Elahi NA 60 : Ayaz Ameer NA 61 : Maj Tahir Sadiq NA 61 : Ch Saqlain NA 63 : Fawad hussain Ch NA 66 : Barrister Abdullah Mumtaz Kahloon NA 69 : Umar Aslam Khan NA 70 : Sardar Shujja Muhammad Khan NA 71 : Atta Ullah Essa khelvi NA 72 : Amjad Ali Khan Niazi NA 73 : Muhammad Sanaullah Khan Masti Khel NA 74 : Rasheed Akbar Khan nuwani NA 75 : Fawad Ahmed Cheema NA 78 : Muhammad Safdar Shakir NA 80 : Rana Zahid Touseef NA 91 : Sahibzada Muhammad Mehboob Sultan NA101: Muhammad Ahmed Chatta NA 102: Chaudhary Shaukat Ali Bhatti NA 108: Haji Mumtaz Ahmed Gujjar NA 109: Nazar Muhammad Gondal NA 110: Usman Dar NA 111: Dr firdos Ashiq Awan NA 125: IMRAN KHAN NA 128: Malik Karamat Khokar NA 131 : Umar Aftab Dhillon NA 140: Khursheed Qasoori NA 141: Sardar Muhammad Asif Nakai NA 142:Sardar Talib Nakai NA 150: Shah Mehmood Qureshi NA 152 : Ibraheem Khan NA 158 : Pir Zahoor Hussain Qureshi NA 159 : Malik Ghulam Murtaza Metla NA 160 : Ch Nauraiz Shakoor Khan NA 161 : Malik Muhammad Yar Dhakoo NA 163 : Malik Nauman Langriyal NA 165 : Mian Ahmed Raza Manika NA 168 :Ishaq Khakwani NA 169 : Aftab Ahmed Khan KIchi NA 170 : Muhammad Aurangzaib Khan Khichi NA 171: Khawja Sheeraz Mehmood NA 171 : Zartaj Gul Akhwand NA 173: Sardar Muhammad Saifuddin Khosa NA 174: Sardar Nasrullah Khan Dreshak NA 175:Mir Dost Muhammad Mazari NA 230 : Shah Mehmood Qureshi NA 256: Sardar Yar Mohammed Rind NA 259: Dawood Khan Kakar NA 260: Qasim Khan Suri NA 261: Nawab Khan Dumarr NA 262: Nazeer Khan Achakzai انفارمیشن سیکرٹری ریجن لاہور ۔
    0 Comments 0 Shares 449 Views
  • Salaams.brother American senator Kesha Ram ,great grand daughter of sir Ganga ram is visiting Lahore,she will deliver a talk in Lahore bar association also on invitation of Rubina Mumtaz Sehrai

    She want the maximum coverage media , social media coverage.can you support me to make this memorable for her,so she remember this love from Pakistanis always
    Salaams.brother American senator Kesha Ram ,great grand daughter of sir Ganga ram is visiting Lahore,she will deliver a talk in Lahore bar association also on invitation of Rubina Mumtaz Sehrai She want the maximum coverage media , social media coverage.can you support me to make this memorable for her,so she remember this love from Pakistanis always ❤️
    0 Comments 0 Shares 535 Views
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
    (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    PRESENT:
    MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN
    MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI
    Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 AND
    CMA No.676 of 2023
    Ghulam Mehmood Dogar
    VERSUS
    Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Division, Islamabad and others
    Petitioner(s)
    Respondent(s)
    For the Petitioner(s) For the Federation
    For Punjab Government On Court’s Call
    Date of Hearing
    : Mr. Abid S. Zuberi, ASC
    : Barrister Shehzad Atta Elahi, Attorney General for Pakistan
    Ch. Aamir Rehman, Addl.AGP Sajid-ul-Hassan, Section Officer, Establishment Division
    : Malik Waseem Mumtaz, Addl.AG, Pb. Mr. Sattar Sahil, AAG, Pb.
    : Mr. Sikandar Sutlan Raja,
    Chief Election Commissioner
    Zafar Iqbal Hussain, Spl. Secretary, Election Commission of Pakistan
    Ms. Samia Tariq Janjua, Dy. Director (Law), ECP
    : 16.02.2023 ORDER
    This is an application (CMA No.676 of 2023) under Order XXXIII Rule VI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 for placement of additional documents on record. Subject to all just and legal exceptions, the application is allowed.
    2. Pursuant to our orders dated 02.12.2022 and 25.01.2023, the learned Attorney General for Pakistan as well

    Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022
    - 2 -
    as an Additional Advocate General, Punjab have appeared. The learned Attorney General for Pakistan has pointed out that a notification had been issued for repatriation of the petitioner (Ghulam Mehmood Dogar) to the Federal Government which had been suspended by a two member Bench of the Federal Service Tribunal at Lahore vide order dated 10.11.2022. However, another two member Bench of the same Tribunal had suspended the said order through a subsequent order dated 24.11.2022 which was challenged before this Court through the instant CPLA. The order dated 24.11.2022 was suspended by this Court vide order dated 02.12.2022. He maintains that the Federal Government has nothing to do with the latest transfer of the petitioner. He points out that the Notification dated 23.01.2023 regarding transfer of the petitioner with a direction to report to the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD), Government of Punjab, Lahore for further orders has been issued by the Governor of Punjab.
    3. We have asked the learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab how such transfer has been ordered considering the fact that in terms of Section 230 of the Election Act, 2017 (“the Act”), there is a specific bar on the caretaker Governments against transfers/postings of public officials unless it is considered expedient and that too after approval of the Election Commission of Pakistan (“ECP”). The learned Additional Advocate General has submitted that the

    Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022
    - 3 -
    transfer had been undertaken after seeking approval of the ECP.
    4. In order to clarify the position of the ECP, we asked the Chief Election Commissioner (“CEC”) to appear before us in the matter. The CEC appeared and stated that the ECP had deliberated upon the issue of transfers and postings and had issued guidelines/policy for transfers/postings to be undertaken by the caretaker Governments such guidelines were sent to the Provincial Governments. He submitted that a request was received from the Government of Punjab for transfer of the petitioner and permission for such transfer was granted by the ECP. He maintained that the ECP is committed to hold free and fair elections in accordance with law and the Constitution and in order to fulfil its mandate to hold free and fair elections where necessary it has permitted transfers/postings in exercise of its powers under Section 230(2)(f) of the Act.
    5. He was not in a position to explain to us without availability of the relevant record whether the case of the petitioner was considered by the ECP separately and if a specific order had been passed after considering the question of expediency. He undertakes to file the requisite documents including minutes of the meeting in which this matter and/or the policy/guidelines for transfers/postings by the caretaker Governments were to be permitted. Let copies of the relevant record be placed on the file alongwith its detailed report. We asked the CEC whether he was aware of the fact that the

    Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022
    - 4 -
    matter of transfer of the petitioner was sub judice before this Court and interim orders had been passed. The worthy CEC stated that such fact was not brought to his notice either by the Government of Punjab or by the functionaries of the ECP.
    6. During the course of arguments it has been submitted that transfers and postings under the facts and circumstances of this case have a direct reference to the elections which are required to be held within 90 days of the dissolution of the Provincial Assembly of Punjab. It was submitted that although transfers/postings were being undertaken, the election date had not been announced which constitutes violation of Article 224(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (“the Constitution”). The worthy CEC submitted that the ECP was committed to fulfil its constitutional obligations however it lacked jurisdiction to announce a date for the elections which, according to him, fell within the domain of the Governors of the respective Provinces in the case of Provincial Assemblies. He maintained that the Governor of Punjab had not announced the date on the ground that since the Assembly had not been dissolved on his order, he had no jurisdiction to give the election date and the ECP was not empowered under the Constitution to announce a date. He also maintained that the ECP has moved an application before the Lahore High Court for clarification of its judgment dated 10.02.2023. The High Court rendered a judgment directing the ECP to immediately announce the date of election of the Punjab

    Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022
    - 5 -
    Provincial Assembly after consultation with the Governor of Punjab, being the constitutional Head of the Province to ensure that the elections are held not later than 90 days as per the mandate of the Constitution.
    7. We note that the Provincial Assembly of Punjab stood dissolved on 14.01.2023 pursuant to the Advice of the Chief Minister, Punjab dated 12.01.2023. As such, elections to the Punjab Provincial Assembly are required to be held within 90 days of the said date in terms of Article 224(2) of the Constitution. However, no progress appears to have taken place in this regard and there is a real and eminent danger of violation of a clear and unambiguous constitutional command.
    8. In view of the fact that this matter is not before us in the present lis, we are not inclined to pass any order in this regard in view of the principle of law laid down by this Court in its judgment reported as Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2021: In the matter of (PLD 2022 SC 306). We are, however, of the view that the matter brought to our notice during these proceedings raises a serious question of public importance with reference to enforcement of Fundamental Rights conferred by Chapter-1 of Part-II of the Constitution. Considering the fact that unless timely steps are taken to remedy the situation, there is an eminent danger of violation of the Constitution which we are under a constitutional, legal and moral duty to defend. We therefore consider it a fit case to refer to the Hon’ble CJP to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction

    Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022
    - 6 -
    of this Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, who may if he considers appropriate after invoking jurisdiction under the said Article constitute a Bench to take up the matter. Let the office place this file before the Hon’ble CJP for appropriate orders.
    9. To the extent of Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 alongwith all miscellaneous applications, the matter shall be taken up tomorrow i.e. 17.02.2023.
    Islamabad
    16.02.2023
    ZR */
    Not approved for reporting
    Judge
    Judge


    Explain this case in points

    This is a summary of the case mentioned in the text:

    1. Civil Petition No. 3988 of 2022 is a legal proceeding in the Supreme Court of Pakistan involving the petitioner Ghulam Mehmood Dogar and the respondents, the Federation of Pakistan and others.

    2. The petitioner was notified for repatriation to the Federal Government, which was suspended by a two-member bench of the Federal Service Tribunal. However, another two-member bench of the same tribunal suspended the order, which was challenged before the Supreme Court.

    3. The transfer of the petitioner to the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD), Government of Punjab, Lahore was ordered by the Governor of Punjab after seeking approval from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

    4. The CEC appeared in court to clarify the position of the ECP and stated that the ECP had granted permission for the transfer of the petitioner after receiving a request from the Government of Punjab. The CEC also stated that the ECP was not aware that the matter was sub judice before the court.

    5. The court noted that the Provincial Assembly of Punjab had been dissolved on January 14, 2023, and elections to the Assembly were required to be held within 90 days of the dissolution. However, no progress had been made in this regard, raising a serious question of public importance with reference to enforcement of Fundamental Rights.

    6. The court considered it a fit case to refer to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction of the court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. The office was instructed to place the file before the Hon’ble CJP for appropriate orders.

    7. The matter related to Civil Petition No. 3988 of 2022, along with all miscellaneous applications, was scheduled to be taken up the next day (February 17, 2023).

    Okay, let me explain it to you in a simpler way.

    Imagine you have a toy that you really love and you dont want to give it to someone else. But one day, someone came and took your toy away and said you have to give it to someone else. You didnt like that, so you asked for help from the teacher at school.

    The teacher listened to both sides and then decided to ask the principal to help solve the problem. The principal will look at the situation and make a decision that is fair for everyone.

    Thats kind of what happened in this case. A man named Ghulam Mehmood Dogar was told he had to work for the government in a different city. He didnt like that, so he asked the Supreme Court of Pakistan for help. The Supreme Court listened to both sides and then asked the Chief Justice of Pakistan to make a decision that is fair for everyone.
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 AND CMA No.676 of 2023 Ghulam Mehmood Dogar VERSUS Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Division, Islamabad and others Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) For the Petitioner(s) For the Federation For Punjab Government On Court’s Call Date of Hearing : Mr. Abid S. Zuberi, ASC : Barrister Shehzad Atta Elahi, Attorney General for Pakistan Ch. Aamir Rehman, Addl.AGP Sajid-ul-Hassan, Section Officer, Establishment Division : Malik Waseem Mumtaz, Addl.AG, Pb. Mr. Sattar Sahil, AAG, Pb. : Mr. Sikandar Sutlan Raja, Chief Election Commissioner Zafar Iqbal Hussain, Spl. Secretary, Election Commission of Pakistan Ms. Samia Tariq Janjua, Dy. Director (Law), ECP : 16.02.2023 ORDER This is an application (CMA No.676 of 2023) under Order XXXIII Rule VI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 for placement of additional documents on record. Subject to all just and legal exceptions, the application is allowed. 2. Pursuant to our orders dated 02.12.2022 and 25.01.2023, the learned Attorney General for Pakistan as well Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 - 2 - as an Additional Advocate General, Punjab have appeared. The learned Attorney General for Pakistan has pointed out that a notification had been issued for repatriation of the petitioner (Ghulam Mehmood Dogar) to the Federal Government which had been suspended by a two member Bench of the Federal Service Tribunal at Lahore vide order dated 10.11.2022. However, another two member Bench of the same Tribunal had suspended the said order through a subsequent order dated 24.11.2022 which was challenged before this Court through the instant CPLA. The order dated 24.11.2022 was suspended by this Court vide order dated 02.12.2022. He maintains that the Federal Government has nothing to do with the latest transfer of the petitioner. He points out that the Notification dated 23.01.2023 regarding transfer of the petitioner with a direction to report to the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD), Government of Punjab, Lahore for further orders has been issued by the Governor of Punjab. 3. We have asked the learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab how such transfer has been ordered considering the fact that in terms of Section 230 of the Election Act, 2017 (“the Act”), there is a specific bar on the caretaker Governments against transfers/postings of public officials unless it is considered expedient and that too after approval of the Election Commission of Pakistan (“ECP”). The learned Additional Advocate General has submitted that the Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 - 3 - transfer had been undertaken after seeking approval of the ECP. 4. In order to clarify the position of the ECP, we asked the Chief Election Commissioner (“CEC”) to appear before us in the matter. The CEC appeared and stated that the ECP had deliberated upon the issue of transfers and postings and had issued guidelines/policy for transfers/postings to be undertaken by the caretaker Governments such guidelines were sent to the Provincial Governments. He submitted that a request was received from the Government of Punjab for transfer of the petitioner and permission for such transfer was granted by the ECP. He maintained that the ECP is committed to hold free and fair elections in accordance with law and the Constitution and in order to fulfil its mandate to hold free and fair elections where necessary it has permitted transfers/postings in exercise of its powers under Section 230(2)(f) of the Act. 5. He was not in a position to explain to us without availability of the relevant record whether the case of the petitioner was considered by the ECP separately and if a specific order had been passed after considering the question of expediency. He undertakes to file the requisite documents including minutes of the meeting in which this matter and/or the policy/guidelines for transfers/postings by the caretaker Governments were to be permitted. Let copies of the relevant record be placed on the file alongwith its detailed report. We asked the CEC whether he was aware of the fact that the Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 - 4 - matter of transfer of the petitioner was sub judice before this Court and interim orders had been passed. The worthy CEC stated that such fact was not brought to his notice either by the Government of Punjab or by the functionaries of the ECP. 6. During the course of arguments it has been submitted that transfers and postings under the facts and circumstances of this case have a direct reference to the elections which are required to be held within 90 days of the dissolution of the Provincial Assembly of Punjab. It was submitted that although transfers/postings were being undertaken, the election date had not been announced which constitutes violation of Article 224(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (“the Constitution”). The worthy CEC submitted that the ECP was committed to fulfil its constitutional obligations however it lacked jurisdiction to announce a date for the elections which, according to him, fell within the domain of the Governors of the respective Provinces in the case of Provincial Assemblies. He maintained that the Governor of Punjab had not announced the date on the ground that since the Assembly had not been dissolved on his order, he had no jurisdiction to give the election date and the ECP was not empowered under the Constitution to announce a date. He also maintained that the ECP has moved an application before the Lahore High Court for clarification of its judgment dated 10.02.2023. The High Court rendered a judgment directing the ECP to immediately announce the date of election of the Punjab Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 - 5 - Provincial Assembly after consultation with the Governor of Punjab, being the constitutional Head of the Province to ensure that the elections are held not later than 90 days as per the mandate of the Constitution. 7. We note that the Provincial Assembly of Punjab stood dissolved on 14.01.2023 pursuant to the Advice of the Chief Minister, Punjab dated 12.01.2023. As such, elections to the Punjab Provincial Assembly are required to be held within 90 days of the said date in terms of Article 224(2) of the Constitution. However, no progress appears to have taken place in this regard and there is a real and eminent danger of violation of a clear and unambiguous constitutional command. 8. In view of the fact that this matter is not before us in the present lis, we are not inclined to pass any order in this regard in view of the principle of law laid down by this Court in its judgment reported as Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2021: In the matter of (PLD 2022 SC 306). We are, however, of the view that the matter brought to our notice during these proceedings raises a serious question of public importance with reference to enforcement of Fundamental Rights conferred by Chapter-1 of Part-II of the Constitution. Considering the fact that unless timely steps are taken to remedy the situation, there is an eminent danger of violation of the Constitution which we are under a constitutional, legal and moral duty to defend. We therefore consider it a fit case to refer to the Hon’ble CJP to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 - 6 - of this Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, who may if he considers appropriate after invoking jurisdiction under the said Article constitute a Bench to take up the matter. Let the office place this file before the Hon’ble CJP for appropriate orders. 9. To the extent of Civil Petition No.3988 of 2022 alongwith all miscellaneous applications, the matter shall be taken up tomorrow i.e. 17.02.2023. Islamabad 16.02.2023 ZR */ Not approved for reporting Judge Judge Explain this case in points This is a summary of the case mentioned in the text: 1. Civil Petition No. 3988 of 2022 is a legal proceeding in the Supreme Court of Pakistan involving the petitioner Ghulam Mehmood Dogar and the respondents, the Federation of Pakistan and others. 2. The petitioner was notified for repatriation to the Federal Government, which was suspended by a two-member bench of the Federal Service Tribunal. However, another two-member bench of the same tribunal suspended the order, which was challenged before the Supreme Court. 3. The transfer of the petitioner to the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD), Government of Punjab, Lahore was ordered by the Governor of Punjab after seeking approval from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). 4. The CEC appeared in court to clarify the position of the ECP and stated that the ECP had granted permission for the transfer of the petitioner after receiving a request from the Government of Punjab. The CEC also stated that the ECP was not aware that the matter was sub judice before the court. 5. The court noted that the Provincial Assembly of Punjab had been dissolved on January 14, 2023, and elections to the Assembly were required to be held within 90 days of the dissolution. However, no progress had been made in this regard, raising a serious question of public importance with reference to enforcement of Fundamental Rights. 6. The court considered it a fit case to refer to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction of the court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. The office was instructed to place the file before the Hon’ble CJP for appropriate orders. 7. The matter related to Civil Petition No. 3988 of 2022, along with all miscellaneous applications, was scheduled to be taken up the next day (February 17, 2023). Okay, let me explain it to you in a simpler way. Imagine you have a toy that you really love and you don't want to give it to someone else. But one day, someone came and took your toy away and said you have to give it to someone else. You didn't like that, so you asked for help from the teacher at school. The teacher listened to both sides and then decided to ask the principal to help solve the problem. The principal will look at the situation and make a decision that is fair for everyone. That's kind of what happened in this case. A man named Ghulam Mehmood Dogar was told he had to work for the government in a different city. He didn't like that, so he asked the Supreme Court of Pakistan for help. The Supreme Court listened to both sides and then asked the Chief Justice of Pakistan to make a decision that is fair for everyone.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 955 Views
  • You will improve Pakistan! I will improve Pakistan - Pakistan Zindabad

    Youth Confernce Lahore at umt
    You will improve Pakistan! I will improve Pakistan 🇵🇰- Pakistan Zindabad Youth Confernce Lahore at umt
    0 Comments 0 Shares 268 Views 0
More Results